Sorry for the late reply! I was so tired yesterday that I just had a deep sleep. I report the total test results to you. When Windows 7 compatible mode with administrator mode and fullscreen is turned on, error occurs at WH=7,9,11. There is no error at WH=8. Sorry for the wrong report! The same problem occurs in 32-bit and 64-bit. Still, I'm not going to use a pixalate this high, so I don't have any problems working with it. Thanks again! I Attached the image in error. The original size of the image is 3840x2160. There is an error where the image is not completely covered at WH=2. I also attach that part.
The test environment is Windows 10 1920x1080!
pixelator
Recent community posts
All other bugs have been fixed. it is very stable when running in administrator mode with Windows 7 compatibility on the 32-bit version. There is an error from pixelatedWH=7,8. but if I don't use this number, I can use it with great peace of mind. Your health is important. Even in its current state, it will be much more useful than before. Thank you!
I tried turning on the fullscreen by pressing F in admin mode after setting it to Windows 7 compatibility. It doesn't work normally.
%%NOTE: I uploaded the Fullscreen ScreenShot
And I tried reducing the image size to 1920x1080 again. The problem you were talking about has been resolved, but there is a strange vertical line at the bottom.
This phenomenon is the same for 2x2,8x8.
Dithering is not generated properly in full screen mode.
The last image is a phenomenon caused when stored in Fullscreenmode.
If you fix the strange vertical stripes again, I think I can use it without any problems!
%%NOTE:All of this was tested with the v157 hotfix.
I am using Windows 10, and the font size is 100%, which is the default of Windows 10. I'm using a desktop.
But I have also seen this error on other computers with 4K monitors attached. The computer is running Windows 7.
That computer is my personal work computer and is currently not accessible. I am currently home. Sorry.
I live in another non-English speaking country, but I am a programmer. I have witnessed js error on v135 you made. I mainly use c# and c++, but not javascript, so it may not help. Still, I want to help you as much as I can.
In my opinion, in the process of converting an image to a floating point between 0 and 1, I want to check if there is any error in the position of the pixels. Floating point errors sometimes make a roundoff operation. The key to this problem is that the dithering doesn't work in areas where it should be. Somewhere, it seems that the pixel is clearly not recognizing where it should be taken.
Or, it may be that the dithering position is pushed by one and the calculation is not possible.
I love this program so much that I want to help improve it whenever possible.
Sorry. As a result of testing on v155, the same problem occurs with pixelate W,H=3 and W,H=4. I press F to get fullscreen. The reason seems to be simply a matter of size. I want to give you the information you want, but I think this is the limit I can provide.
%%NOTE:Unfortunately, batch processing also creates the same problem.
I just discovered that I can open the preset file with Notepad. In the image I uploaded earlier, I adjusted the area inside the red box.
Also uploads the preset information.
{"c2array":true,"size":[200,1,1],"data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}
I will give you more information for your exact test.
In v155, pressing F works the fullscreen normally I wasn't thinking of trying to test it because the fullscreen mode was not available on the v157 by pressing F. Sorry.
When I pressed F, the strange stripes disappeared as well. But it still seems that the problem occurs.
I will Attach a screenshot. This is an image that worked on fullscreen in v155.
My resolution is 1920x1080. I'm sorry I can't provide you a preset file.
I have no way to upload files here.
I will also take a screenshot of the preset information.
%%NOTE: I also edited Dither Amount to 14
I just tried the fullscreen function by pressing the F key. I have tested both 4K monitors and 1K monitors. On both screens, the export button disappeared off the screen, so I couldn't press export. I'm using windows 10, is that the cause? Anyway, I'll keep you informed to improve your program.
I just downloaded v155. I will test this.
Currently, when editing images in pixatool v157, it seems that the alpha channel is lost when selecting a pallete.
However, if you leave the pallete at 0, the alpha channel is revived again.
pixatool is a very cool program, so I personally thank you for making this program.
However, since pixatool blows up the alpha channel, I am exporting and combining an image in photoshop with no palette set and an image with palette set .
This is very annoying and exhausting.
I highly value your ability to develop this program.
I think you can create a function that embeds an alpha value into a stored image.
This program can be more productive, and it's a great one.
If you can improve these areas, I can recommend this program to the workers around me.
I hope you to improve these features in the next version